Arisia v Lunacon
18 March 2008 21:21Arisia's Writer Guest of Honor this year was Laura Anne Gilman, who writes young adult fiction, Buffyverse, Quantum Leap-verse, etc.
Lunacon's Writer Guest of Honor this year was Jacqueline Carey, who writes streamy fantasy/romance novels featuring heavy BDSM/kink plot elements.
Yet Arisia becomes the sex con, and Lunacon the literary con, in the minds of many. Interesting.
Lunacon's Writer Guest of Honor this year was Jacqueline Carey, who writes streamy fantasy/romance novels featuring heavy BDSM/kink plot elements.
Yet Arisia becomes the sex con, and Lunacon the literary con, in the minds of many. Interesting.
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 01:47 (UTC)no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 01:54 (UTC)no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 03:48 (UTC)no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 02:02 (UTC)no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 02:44 (UTC)Gasp, might this imply that people associate polyamory with excessive sex?
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 02:48 (UTC)no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 03:47 (UTC)no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 16:11 (UTC)no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 02:21 (UTC)but yeah. It is odd.
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 02:42 (UTC)Sexuality in Science Fiction and Fantasy
Sex Done Right
High Tech Sex
Classic to Erotic
Bondage in Brundage
Sex Machines
Geeks Love Kinky Sex
Sex Magick
Fetish Etiquette
The Hanky Code
LBGT Meet & Greet
Arisia doesn't have a LOT more than that. (Also, I don't know what you mean by "non-guest content", but I saw a hotel suite with a sign on the door promoting their invite-only kinky sex party. Totally out in the open, totally 'part' of the con.)
I was not indicating that the GOH set the tone for a con. I was using the GOHs as a singular example of a juxtaposition I found amusing. The panels/workshops/attendee content is, from my experience, mostly similar outside of that.
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 02:54 (UTC)And I also know that I really need to go to more cons. I've obviously been going to all the wrong cons since I started going to them.
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 02:59 (UTC)no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 02:59 (UTC)no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 03:55 (UTC)Whoa. Whoawhoawhoa. Those guys are NOT, by any stretch of the imagination, "part" of the con. We don't like them, we don't have anything to do with them, we actively work against them (ie take down their fliers, bitch them out when they put out fliers, call security on them at various points of the con when they get too excited about getting folks into said party, etc). They are members of the con who come to the con and throw sex parties, but they are NOT part of Lunacon. At all. In fact, they needed to register the hotel under a different name than last year because we wouldn't let the chick from 2007 reserve a room for '08.
Also, neither LGBT M&G and Sexuality in SF are After Dark Programming. Sexuality was about how SFF pushes the envelope of what is acceptable (Trek first on-screen interracial kiss, openly accepting GLBTQ relationships, etc etc) and how that works as a marker for society.
" As in fandom itself, sexuality in science fiction and fantasy tends to be very diverse and open. Instead of sticking to the two gender binary, SFF explores many kinds of gender and sexuality, including Ursula K. Le Guin's Left Hand of Darkness and Storm Constantine's Wraeththu Chronicles. A discussion about how SFF is leading the way to a more open and accepting society, one novel at a time."
Lunacon had 600+ hours of programming this year. Assuming you did want to count LGBTQ as an After dark, that's one sexual panel for about 60 other panels. What's Arisia's ratio? I'm betting the answer to that is why Arisia's considered more of a sex con than Lunacon is.
And, though JC is famous for the Kushiel's Legacy series, she was on only two of the panels you listed: Sexuality in SFF and Sex Done Right, which focused on writing sex in such a way as to not sound like an utter ass. And she was on twelve program items total. Sex was NOT her main focus at all. Nor is it Lunacon's
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 04:11 (UTC)I wasn't listing After Dark programming, I was listing panels that caught my eye when I flipped through the pocket program looking for "sex-related" things.
I am a bit taken aback by your reaction; do you think I'm trying to paint Lunacon in some sleazy, sexy way? I'm not. I'm honestly stating that Lunacon embraces sexuality to a similar extent (in my mind) as Arisia when it comes to panels and programming, and that Lunacon's GOH this year writes material that is more sex-focused than Arisia's, and yet the perception of Arisia as the sex con exists, and this is interesting to me. You react like I'm insulting Lunacon or calling it sex-focused, when I don't see that I am at all!
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 04:34 (UTC)That frustrated me some, as I know you know that's a wildly specious argument, and so I was a little hurt why you'd "need" to make it that way just to make Lunacon look sleazy.
Which prolly shoulda been my first (or eighth) clue that you weren't, but then I got distracted by the sex-party people as being part of Lunacon--*shudders* and that pushed all my wrong buttons. Especially since they nearly got us evicted from the hotel (and sued!) AGAIN last year. And they aren't even supposed to be out in the open. They're not allowed to advertise, because it could get us into a lot of trouble if someone wants to read it as a form of prostitution--since if people did assume this is a con-sanctioned event, and people need to pay to get into the con, then people are paying for sex. It gets ugly.
I'm sorry I snapped. But these folks bother me, and any affiliation makes me kick first and ask questions later. I'm also still pretty much in knee-jerk rabid-defense mode, as Lunacon is "mine" now, and any criticism of it is read (by me) as a criticism of me. Which is one thing when it's deserved, and something else when it's not.
Probably the biggest reason Arisia's portrayed as a sex con and Lunacon isn't? Look at the demographics. Arisia's mostly young college kids. Lunacon's crowd is much older, with another big chunk of our attendees under 16.
Sorry, hon.
no subject
on 20 Mar 2008 02:54 (UTC)On the real topics: I actually kinda perceive Arisia and Lunacon as having a similar % of "young college kids" and teenagers, but with Arisia having more 25-35 year olds and Lunacon having more 35-55 year olds. And how much there is the chicken and the egg, I wonder?
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 13:38 (UTC)I've never read Laura Anne Gilman, so I can't comment to that.
no subject
on 20 Mar 2008 02:49 (UTC)Who considered her as such? Who denied the depth of her worlds, of the interesting approaches to history and religion and government that she uses? Because it wasn't me.
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 11:32 (UTC)Meet and Greets are friendly to the younger crowd, but the biggest Lunacon meet & greet is "Meet the Pros".
Basically, what I'm saying is that this is easily double the amount of sex-related programming from previous years.
There is one sex party each year (probably the one that you saw advertised) that is not a part of the con and, in fact, has been a thorn in Lunacon's side for years. They follow us. Often, they advertise on orgy communities and lists and we get a number of random strangers in off the street trying to "register" for the orgy in programming ops. I honestly wish we could get a restraining order or something. But they get a room in the hotel and are paying guests, so it's difficult to sort out. The hotel yells at them every year not to put out their flyers.
no subject
on 20 Mar 2008 02:56 (UTC)This is one thing I did not know (not having last year either indelibly etched into my mind, nor having an old program handy) and does help balance those things out in my head. I remember being in programming ops last year and dealing with someone trying to sign up for the orgy. *shudder* Also the anger that ensued. Yay, fun.
no subject
on 19 Mar 2008 17:28 (UTC)So I would argue some of the perception is due to being "that" con where "that" party goes on so that the one became synonymous with the other in the heads of the attendees.
That's my $.02 conspiracy theory anyway.
no subject
on 20 Mar 2008 02:57 (UTC)