on 17 Nov 2004 13:45 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] waya3k.livejournal.com
Just one more example of the Rule of the Minority that was perfected by the left now being used by the right.

on 17 Nov 2004 21:55 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] isaiahblake.livejournal.com
I hope you mean that in the 'hey, this is wrong no matter who's doing it' kind of way.

Rather than the 'everyone else is jumping off the bridge' kind of way.

The fact that you brought up the left makes me think, at least subtextually, you meant the second.

on 18 Nov 2004 05:42 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] waya3k.livejournal.com
I think it is apprehensible no matter who uses it. I just find it amusing when the left gets bent out of shape when the right does use it.

on 18 Nov 2004 06:13 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
I make a difference between the minority ruling that all should be treated equally, and the minority ruling that other people can't be doing 'X' because then we'd be acting like a certain group of people and that group is bad.

[livejournal.com profile] londo and I were discussing this last night... hopefully he'll hop on and add his comment. If not I'll summarize for him later.

on 18 Nov 2004 06:14 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] londo.livejournal.com
Not exactly. Like nearly every political strategy ever used, the left hit on it first, but it's the right that's perfecting it. But, yes, it's totally the same strategy, just applied in the other direction.

Moral relativism is a tricky beast.

on 19 Nov 2004 14:33 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
If the majority of people were women, do you think that means that men shouldn't have rights?

on 19 Nov 2004 14:37 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] waya3k.livejournal.com
As far as I am concerned only land owners should be allowed to vote.

on 19 Nov 2004 14:37 (UTC)

on 19 Nov 2004 14:37 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
Okay. Now that I think about it, that's not the best example. I don't want to open a can of gender war worms. Anywho, the point is that the minority should still have rights. It doesn't matter if it's the left or the right. We have to have wiggle room for everyone.

(What's with all my worm references?)

on 19 Nov 2004 23:29 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] isaiahblake.livejournal.com
Freud would have many things to say about the worm references, I'm sure.

on 21 Nov 2004 12:26 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
I've never cared for Freud's theories, but he was great in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure.

on 17 Nov 2004 13:57 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] zenandtheart.livejournal.com
morons.

on 17 Nov 2004 14:19 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] fluttergrrl30.livejournal.com
Overreact much?

Dude, ruffles won't make your kids' "wing-wang" fall off.

on 17 Nov 2004 14:35 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ratbastrd.livejournal.com
And they replaced it with Camo day? Oh lordy me, some manhood issues here, you think?

on 18 Nov 2004 06:06 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
I like what someone else said... Lemme find it...

Okay, I can't find the original comment or who it was by, but it was basically a reference to the, ""You just keep playing with it and it becomes customary," comment... So now instead of letting their kids dress up as members of the opposite gender to become "accustomed" to being gay (or whatever), they're having their kids dress up in camo to become "accustomed" to soldiers/military members/etc... scary.

on 17 Nov 2004 17:13 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ezrarashkae.livejournal.com
Jeeze, there's always that one person that needs to piss in everybody else's cornflakes.

on 17 Nov 2004 21:58 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] isaiahblake.livejournal.com
I read an interesting article about French politics and their comparison to American politics throughout history recently. Apparently, on financial issues, France has traditionally tried to mimic American policy decisions. Recently (the past decade or so), they've had to deal with more social political decisions, however, and the standard French practice has become one of differentiation from American policy.

Puritanical moral roots. Yay!

on 18 Nov 2004 06:02 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
I don't suppose this is an online article?

on 18 Nov 2004 08:45 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sammid.livejournal.com
God shit like that makes me want to scream *deep breaths*
Why in the hell can't it just be said that the bitch that shit on everyone's parade be told that her kids can look like tards,and go to school dressed as they normally would,while everyone else has fun?!Instead one fucking person gets her way,and ruins it for everyone else??

on 19 Nov 2004 23:31 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] isaiahblake.livejournal.com
Yes, but it's in a journal of politics. I'm not sure where you'd find it; I found it through my school's online research database. Hence, school id. I'll send you a copy of the article sometime.

on 20 Nov 2004 05:18 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Yeah, it sounds like very interesting and informative reading.

I need more of that in my life.

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 1 March 2026 11:20
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios