In recent discussions with the
som_pos fans I met Saturday night, I'm reminded once again why should - and do - hardly ever get drunk. Heh.
It's a neverending succession of "Oh no, I said THAT?" *facepalm*
Wait, maybe I have this backwards. I drink so rarely that when I do, I feel the need to reach the fun-drunk stage. Perhaps I should get fun-drunk more often at home so that I don't feel obliged to do so when I'm out meeting people for the first time. ;) Hehe.
It's a neverending succession of "Oh no, I said THAT?" *facepalm*
Wait, maybe I have this backwards. I drink so rarely that when I do, I feel the need to reach the fun-drunk stage. Perhaps I should get fun-drunk more often at home so that I don't feel obliged to do so when I'm out meeting people for the first time. ;) Hehe.
no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 10:53 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 11:18 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 11:26 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 11:16 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 11:28 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 11:33 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 12:21 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 13:00 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 14:24 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 15:53 (UTC)I was at a wedding this weekend. If I were the sort of person to do so, I'd have enough ammunition on my relatives to start my own tabloid. The wine tasted like someone's boot, too, which leaves me confused how any of them could get plastered in the first place.
"Fun-drunk" is a misnomer created by revisionist historians. Thumbs down. ;)
no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 18:34 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Sep 2003 19:06 (UTC)