(no subject)
29 May 2001 17:45I weigh 160.
I've decided that I'll use my long work days to my advantage. I'm not going anorexic or anything, but since I simply don't have any place to fit in a lunch, I won't. I'll have my shake and vitamins in the morning, and then dinner at night. I don't need that many calories since I'm not burning any during the day while sitting on my ass...
I think I'll exercise, too. I have exercise videos... Do you think I can get my sorry ass out of bed on M/W/F mornings to alternate between the 3? Hmm...
I've decided that I'll use my long work days to my advantage. I'm not going anorexic or anything, but since I simply don't have any place to fit in a lunch, I won't. I'll have my shake and vitamins in the morning, and then dinner at night. I don't need that many calories since I'm not burning any during the day while sitting on my ass...
I think I'll exercise, too. I have exercise videos... Do you think I can get my sorry ass out of bed on M/W/F mornings to alternate between the 3? Hmm...
no subject
on 29 May 2001 16:28 (UTC)i've been wondering if there are any scales around that i can hop on and see some ridiculously low number (in kilos) and then make the conversion to pounds to see if i have been gaining weight from eating out all the time.
maybe you could exercise at work. if there's enough room on the floor. you could do stomach crunches and stuff. you could even bring hand weights. you could do a few exercises between calls. you could do jumping jacks, or jog in place. you could take the stairs to a bathroom on a different floor.
Re:
on 29 May 2001 19:15 (UTC)I will still have a Dr. Pepper in the middle of the day at work, and if that doesn't keep blood sugar up, I don't know what will... hehe
For a while now I've been going every other day without remembering to bring something for lunch, or with being late to work and not having time to bring something and also (since I was late) not having the free time to go out to eat. My stomach starts rumbling about 3:00 but it's not a total inconvenience, and my stomach and I have been making it through. I just decided today that I'll do that all the time.
I am thinking of going to Goddard or Huffman or somewhere that will test me and tell me my body fat and lean body mass and stuff. I saw a chart online of ideal weights and for height, 20% overweight (clinically obese) is 147 pounds. Therefore, I'm like 30% overweight and clinically obese. I don't think I agree with THAT, but I am overweight. However, this chart said that if you knew your lean body mass, use the height that corresponds to that, and not your exact height. I guess that corrects for frame size, muscle mass, etc. So if I know that stuff, maybe I can get more of an idea of what I should weigh. The chart said a rough estimate was very small frame, sub. 2 inches, small frame -1 in., large frame add 1 in., very large frame +2 in.... However, even if I have a very large frame I was still in the overweight section for being 5'5". BLAH.
And I was looking at this chart AFTER I got upset about my weight, so I'm not doing this all because of some stupid chart. It just was part of what I saw online.
Back to what you were saying. I think I will do some kind of exercise while at work, instead of mudding sometimes. I do get tired of mudding while I'm there because the Mac mud programs can't do as much of the neat stuff that I have set up at home... So instead of bringing a book, I'll bring weights!
no subject
on 29 May 2001 19:52 (UTC)i looked at it. if i were you, i'd find a less fat-fearing source for a chart. like a medical site or 2.
and let me tell you, once you start cutting out meals, it's really hard to stop.
Re:
on 29 May 2001 19:54 (UTC)Re:
on 29 May 2001 19:58 (UTC)no subject
on 29 May 2001 19:55 (UTC)no subject
on 29 May 2001 22:11 (UTC)no subject
on 30 May 2001 16:10 (UTC)i think going in for some sort of analysis thingy is a good idea.
Re:
on 30 May 2001 16:13 (UTC)http://www.geocities.com/arrakeengirl/welcome.html
She's a freak.
She's a mudgirl I have met.
no subject
on 30 May 2001 16:31 (UTC)no subject
on 2 Jun 2001 00:46 (UTC)Re:
on 2 Jun 2001 09:18 (UTC)