Page Summary
rigel.livejournal.com - (no subject)
sjo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ratbastrd.livejournal.com - (no subject)
alexx-kay.livejournal.com - (no subject)
alexx-kay.livejournal.com - (no subject)
emiofbrie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
juldea.livejournal.com - (no subject)
alexx-kay.livejournal.com - (no subject)
crimson5.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Dark Purple for Funky Circles by
- Resources: Smoke Curl
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
on 10 Jul 2008 15:36 (UTC)no subject
on 10 Jul 2008 15:53 (UTC)no subject
on 10 Jul 2008 16:29 (UTC)"The court will annually review procedures for protecting communications, but it will not oversee individual cases. "
i.e., effectively zero court oversight. The justice department (or whomever) can essentially do whatever they want, eavesdrop over whomever they want, without having to obtain a warrant, or any sort of permission from any other body whatsoever. All they have to is be able to show, once a year, that their general procedures are in keeping with the bill. This absolutely and without question amounts to a total degradation of our 4th amendment rights.
C'est la vie.
no subject
on 10 Jul 2008 16:49 (UTC)no subject
on 10 Jul 2008 16:53 (UTC)The "some" in question are liars. FISA law has *always* allowed investigators to track a case-in-progress without requiring warrants ahead of time, requiring only that they get them retroactively within a reasonable time afterward. (48 hours? I don't remember the exact figure.)
And "the bill does not address President George Bush's claim that he has Article 2 constitutional authority as the commander-in-chief to order such activity during times of war."
no subject
on 10 Jul 2008 17:00 (UTC)My understanding is that FISA was voted on years ago, when a lot of Congress was still in "panic" mode after 9/11.
no subject
on 10 Jul 2008 18:32 (UTC)http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25605640/
no subject
on 10 Jul 2008 19:04 (UTC)no subject
on 12 Jul 2008 03:54 (UTC)