In recent days, both President Bush and Governor Romney have attempted
to make a case for defining marriage as a union of a man and a woman
on the grounds that marriage exists mainly for creating and raising
children. This platform is a slap in the face to the thousands if not
millions of childless or childfree couples in the United States. Many
married couples either choose not to have children or physically
cannot, and the current rhetoric insinuates that their marriages lose
validity because of a lack of offspring in their lives. An infertile
couple is no different with regards to procreation than a homosexual
couple - and yet I see no section of this amendment requiring
prospective spouses to prove their fertility in order to receive a
marriage license. If the talking heads are going to base the
definition of marriage on ability to breed, logic dictates they take a
stand against childless couples as well as homosexual couples.
Choosing to exclude only one of these groups without mentioning the
other simply makes obvious the true agenda behind the exclusion - a
veiled attempt to lower a segment of our population to second-class
status simply because of whom they love.
My Name
Somerville, MA
Contracts Administrator
26 years old
to make a case for defining marriage as a union of a man and a woman
on the grounds that marriage exists mainly for creating and raising
children. This platform is a slap in the face to the thousands if not
millions of childless or childfree couples in the United States. Many
married couples either choose not to have children or physically
cannot, and the current rhetoric insinuates that their marriages lose
validity because of a lack of offspring in their lives. An infertile
couple is no different with regards to procreation than a homosexual
couple - and yet I see no section of this amendment requiring
prospective spouses to prove their fertility in order to receive a
marriage license. If the talking heads are going to base the
definition of marriage on ability to breed, logic dictates they take a
stand against childless couples as well as homosexual couples.
Choosing to exclude only one of these groups without mentioning the
other simply makes obvious the true agenda behind the exclusion - a
veiled attempt to lower a segment of our population to second-class
status simply because of whom they love.
My Name
Somerville, MA
Contracts Administrator
26 years old
no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 18:34 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 18:35 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 18:40 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 18:42 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 18:48 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 18:48 (UTC)http://www.wdxcyber.com/nmood13.htm
no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 18:49 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 18:53 (UTC)I'd rather just get my tubes cut, personally. I suspect, however, that once I get off the hormanal BC, my ragin PMS and endometriosis like symptoms will come back.
no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 19:14 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 20:12 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 20:13 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 20:16 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 20:25 (UTC)I bet the Alabama papers wouldn't print that. Just sayin.
You are brilliant and awesome. :)
no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 21:21 (UTC)You are all lovely in any case.
I thought MA was a liberal bastion?
I also understand that charm and politeness don't work round there. Pls advise. (I'm thinking of moving.)
no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 22:51 (UTC)no subject
on 6 Jun 2006 23:33 (UTC)no subject
on 7 Jun 2006 00:19 (UTC)See, I know you ain't from here(Richmond, VA, that is) but we mostly go all Republican. And charm works wonders. But I have heard that Massachusetts is a horse of a different color.
I myself am a Libertarian and a cranky one at that.
Actually, George Herbert Walker Bush grew up in Massachusetts
on 7 Jun 2006 00:31 (UTC)I'm a libertarian, and also a cranky one. I'd invite you to join the cranky libertarian party, but I don't believe in political parties.
Thanks for drawing my attention to the illustrious history of Massachusetts Governors. I need to get proper documentation to remove the "acting" phraseology from all apropriate Governors who took over mid-term. It's my understanding that Governor Swift was Governor by law, and called "Acting Governor" by the Media to undermine her office and bring in Romney.
Re: Actually, George Herbert Walker Bush grew up in Massachusetts
on 7 Jun 2006 00:38 (UTC)massachuusets elects republican governors, usually of hte Weld variety, who are socially liberal but fiscally conservative. whic hromney si... not as much.
Re: she had twins
on 7 Jun 2006 00:40 (UTC)Re: she had twins
on 7 Jun 2006 00:41 (UTC)the thing that amuse dme was that the gov of RI a ttha ttime had some sort of medical problems and was in the hospital 50% of the time, but hta twasok. the fact that she had a 4 day workweek withthe other 3 days workgin form home was unthinkable. save the children. sigh.
Given the current Bush, I'd prefer the less-Texan one.
on 7 Jun 2006 00:44 (UTC)The candidates were Kilgore(R), Kaine(D), and Potts(I). I was very much a supporter of Potts, but K&K were neck and neck, and I hate Jerry Kilgore in that personal kind of way. He is despicable. So I held my nose, voted for Kaine, and will volunteer for Potts next election, even if I am in Mass. When will the American system adopt the Borda count?
Re: Borda Count
on 7 Jun 2006 00:49 (UTC)no subject
on 7 Jun 2006 00:59 (UTC)Stupid Americans.. as if it were unconstitutional to vote someone into office that everybody could agree on!
no subject
on 7 Jun 2006 02:29 (UTC)Charm and politeness don't work? Could've fooled me...
no subject
on 7 Jun 2006 11:27 (UTC)I have a friend who was spayed recently, for, I suspect, less than necessary reasons. Apparently total hysterectomies are more common than needed. Menopause is no good at 23.
(Yet if you ask them to spay you they won't.... Sheesh!)
no subject
on 7 Jun 2006 11:30 (UTC)no subject
on 7 Jun 2006 15:04 (UTC)no subject
on 7 Jun 2006 18:27 (UTC)no subject
on 7 Jun 2006 19:29 (UTC)no subject
on 8 Jun 2006 00:21 (UTC)