juldea: (roar!!!)
[personal profile] juldea
Warning! Incredible whininess follows.

...

OOOOOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW. I am close to tears this hurts so fucking much!!! and I have freaking PERCOCET and it's not stopping all the pain! What do I need to do??

Also, I was really brainless this morning and ate something, which meant they weren't able to put me under general, which means they did the whole procedure - all four teeth - under local. Which scared the fuck out of me but ended up not being that bad. During the procedure at least, the most painful things were the shots of anesthesia - the actual tooth pulling was just a lot of odd pressure.

Right now, of course, different story. OOOOWWWWWWW.

Yes, the pills I'm supposed to take every four hours just hit the mark to take another, and I've been asleep most of the afternoon, so perhaps they work better than I think and I am just in pain because I'm due for another one. But right now I'm wanting to cry waiting for it to kick in.

I need to be entertained, immersively, for at least half an hour, and londo is asleep after staying up all night! Argh! Help!

on 29 Jul 2005 22:07 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ratbastrd.livejournal.com
dunno if i can entertain, but i can at least sympathize. had one removed a year or two ago, and same deal, had to do it under local. just felt weird :P and yeah, that sucked afterwards (but yay vicodin!) so i cant imagine what having 4 out at once would feel like :(

on 29 Jul 2005 22:17 (UTC)
ext_267559: (Warm Fuzzy)
Posted by [identity profile] mr-teem.livejournal.com
Sorry, can't entertain either...but I've felt your pain.

on 29 Jul 2005 22:36 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] galaneia.livejournal.com
I had all 4 pulled at once too. I don't remember what they gave me, but I remember being in serious pain by the time mom got home with the filled prescription.

One thing I forgot to do was to ice my jaw; ended up asymmetrically swollen. I really recommend remembering to ice.

on 29 Jul 2005 22:40 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] crolack.livejournal.com
Generic Percocet or Brand name?

on 29 Jul 2005 23:56 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] anitra.livejournal.com
Yes, the pain sucks a lot. For me, even the pressure when they were taking them out hurt A LOT - I had tears streaming down my face the whole time. The good news: it will get better fairly fast. By tomorrow, you should be down to a manageable level of pain (with the painkillers).

Sorry, I can't come out and entertain either.

Recommendation: once the pain has subsided enough to eat (soft foods), go to Friendly's. Best place to go for a selection of soft foods - pudding, Fribbles, mashed potatoes, meatloaf...

on 30 Jul 2005 01:51 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Feh, one of them took 3-4 times as long as all the others... A lot of the dentist's assistant using this crowbar-like object to pull my cheek off to the side, and the dentist muttering as she yanked... Talk about psychologically damaging. :P

on 30 Jul 2005 01:52 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
The pressure didn't bother me too much, but it's hurting pretty badly now. Well, not NOW, because I seem to be in a good spot on the painkiller cycle. Heh.

Mm, Friendly's. I'll have to look then up online to see if there's a decently close one. :)

on 30 Jul 2005 01:53 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Generic. $10 woo!

on 30 Jul 2005 01:55 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Ice? :P

on 30 Jul 2005 02:51 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] crimson5.livejournal.com
I remember getting all 4 of mine pulled. Not a pleasant week. After around 3 days of yogurt I finally said hell with it and went to McDonalds. (long story, nothing better available) Was barely able to nibble on a cheeseburger. Might I suggest stocking up on non-solid foods?

on 30 Jul 2005 02:56 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Already done! :) Soup and jello, woot.

on 30 Jul 2005 03:12 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] crolack.livejournal.com
Probably your problem. I work for a Pharma company and I learned something interesting today. Generics only have to be 20% effective of what they are following and they don't have to meet any of the safety requirements.

on 30 Jul 2005 04:16 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Ewwwww. :(

on 30 Jul 2005 04:33 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] 43duckies.livejournal.com
As you've no doubt figured out, the key to things like Percoset is to try to stay ahead of the pain, which means taking the next dose just before the previous one has worn off. Makes sleeping tricky, as you've also noticed. :-)

I found that it was helpful to not only apply icepacks to the outside of my face, but to also drink lots and lots of ice water as a sort of internal icepack. It helped numb the pain, and it also helps blood circulation (though that last would be a bad thing if you accidentally dislodge the blood clots in your healing gums, so careful not to use straws or chew gum etc).

The most recent time I had teeth pulled they took my last two wisdom teeth out plus one molar that had been badly repaired by another dentist years ago. I was supposed to see my dentist in Somerville, which was a nice convenient distance from my folk's house in Brookline/Chestnut Hill where I traditionally recover from anything painful enough to require pain meds. Then they discovered asbestos or radon or something in the Somerville office and I had to go see the dentist at his other office, which was somewhere about 45 min away up route 128. I was so terrified that the pain meds would wear off before I got home and filled the prescription (note that I was driving myself home). But the dentist was very nice and actually gave me another shot of local anesthetic right before I left the office. (I've never had any of my wisdom teeth pulled under general anesthesia; it was never even offered to me as an option.) Then of course when I got back to Chestnut Hill the CVS near my folks house was out of percoset. Argh! So I had to drive over to West Roxbury to fill the prescription. I was so eager to get home, take a percoset and get to bed that I didn't notice when they forgot to give me the antibiotic prescription I also had filled. :-)

Anyways, my sympathies.

on 30 Jul 2005 05:20 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ratbastrd.livejournal.com
Egads. Maybe you just need a stronger dentist?

on 30 Jul 2005 10:00 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Heh. Not anymore! :P

that's not true

on 30 Jul 2005 14:06 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sin-vraal.livejournal.com
I have worked for a brand name pharmaceutical company, currently work for a generic one, and teach about it in an MS program at NJ Institute of Technology. I don't know who told you these things about generics, Crolack, but you should send them the following education:

Executive Summary - read the introductory and FAQ of the FDA Orange Book, available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/ob/default.htm - many pharmacists don't know it exists or how to use it, but I use it personally if I am offered a generic choice over a brand name, so I can ensure it will be safe and effective.

Falsehood 1 - generics don't need to meet safety requirements.

Fact 1 - (simplifying it a little for the aske of brevity here) generics do not need additional safety and clinical studies beyond those done by the brand name if and only if they contain the same amount of the same active ingredient, and bioavailability is shown to be equivalent - that is to say, an equivalent absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination profile can be shown such that the same levels of the active ingredient(s) get to the site(s) of action in/for the same duration. What constitutes "same" vs. "not same" would be a good question outside the scope of this discussion, more related to #2 below. And finally, I must point out that just because a generic has the same bioavailability as the brand name, doesn't yet mean it will be approved for human use (again, see below). This is because the inactive ingredients may be different (many used to support the tablet-making process), and may have some impacts on the overall pharmacokinetics and effectiveness of the drug.

Falsehood 2 - generics are OK by FDA if they are as much as 20% less effective than the brand mame

Fact 2 - I am unclear where the "20%" came from, but maybe you have an FDA source for that. In order for the FDA to approve a generic drug, the drug company must prove either bioequivalence or therapeutic equivalence - you can find the definitions here, among many other places: http://www.dotpharmacy.co.uk/upgener2.html - in summary, the generic maker must show data that in the same individuals, in the same dosage regimen, the generic and the brand name result in comparable bioavailability.

Fact 3 - The FDA does not endorse a bioequivalent drug as being of equal effectiveness to a brand name - merely that it is safe, and should be effective; this is why generics are so much cheaper, the extremely reduced testing. However, whether by the generic company or an outside board, individual generic companies' products can be shown to be therapeutically equivalent to the brand name - if the brand name and generic name are bioequivalent, AND show the same efficacy and/or toxicity in clinical trials, then the FDA will specially note their therapeutic equivalence within their Orange Book. You can be much more confident that if the Orange Book shows Company A's generic percocet as equivalent to the Brand Name Company's percocet, that it should be both as safe and effective as the brand name.

If you made it this far, thanks for reading!

ick

on 30 Jul 2005 14:10 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sin-vraal.livejournal.com
I had all four of mine pulled at once too.

I had two that were impacted. These aren't a humongously big deal, but they just don't pop out of your mouth easily. They come in all slanty-like.

The other two were a bigger deal - they were embedded. They were coming in sideways, under the gumline. They had to open up my gums, and saw out pieces of tooth as they went like cutting a juicy steak.

It was then I realized that my brain has a safety interlock against nitrous oxide anaesthesia. I was awake in the back of my head, completely aware of what was going on, and even grabbed the doctor's arm twice and told him I wasn't out. "Stop fighting it" is not what you want to hear. It took 3 doses of the gas and then an injection to get me out past the first few incisions, and I still woke up like 2 or 3 times in the middle of it.

I donno WTF I am gonna do if I ever need serious surgery... :(

Re: that's not true

on 30 Jul 2005 14:47 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
If you made it this far, thanks for reading!

Thanks for writing! :)

Re: ick

on 30 Jul 2005 14:48 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Owie! I only had one impacted, and none of them were imbedded. Thankfully!!

If you have serious surgery, go under general. :P

Re: that's not true

on 30 Jul 2005 14:55 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] crolack.livejournal.com
I'll have to pull the specifics when I'm at work next. However, I would also like to note, that my mom, who's been a registered nurse for 25 years, insists on non-generic medication from her pharmacy. I tend to trust people who work with the shit on a daily basis than anything else.

on 30 Jul 2005 16:03 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] baronbrian.livejournal.com
For the swelling. That can cause a lot of pain all on it's own.

Re: that's not true

on 30 Jul 2005 16:19 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sin-vraal.livejournal.com
I'm not knocking you, your mom, or anyone else for making such a choice - in fact, personally, I try to use brand name drugs whenever I can specifically because of the safety and efficacy data that has been collected for them. But then, one can argue that drugs such as the Fen/Phen combo, Vioxx, the British Flu Vaccine, and various other "fiascos" (or perceived fiascos, as with Vioxx) can show even brand names are not necessarily safe and effective. Really, much of the time, you will not notice a significant pharmacological difference between a generic and a brand name. But the truth is, pharmacists, doctors, and the general public don't typically know how to differentiate between the options to make the "best choice" based on available data. Doctors just prescribe a generic, and leave it up to the pharmacist to pull whatever they have in stock. You, as a consumer, can work with your doctor (ideally, right on the prescription) and/or pharmacist to get a specific company's generic, if you know to ask. You can similarly ask your doctor to note on the prescription 'brand name only', and you won't get substituted at the pharmacy.

The deciding factor for most people is the price - not everyone's got a medical plan like I do where I pay $10 for a one month supply of a brand name drug, and get my generics free. Generics generally offer a safe and effective alternative. And yes, there are some companies - generic and brand name - that end up on FDA shitlists. Read up on Able Laboratories, a generics company who had to take all products off market even after several successful FDA inspections, because they wbere "inventing data". Could happen anywhere, which is part of why prescription drugs are also commonly called "ethical drugs".

Why all of this? As everyone here has experienced I'm sure, not all generics act the same. Some may give you a headache, or some may not feel like they're working at all, although you had great experience with the brand name.

This is because the generic can use different "inactive ingredients", which include (among others): binders (which help the powder stick together as a tablet), disintegrants (which help a tablet dissolve uniformly in the stomach), fillers (like starch or lactose, to bulk up a tablet) lubricants (to prevent the powder from sticking to the machine when pressed into a tablet), coatings, sweeteners, and lakes (colorants). The use of these inactives is limited by the FDA to be neither intended or expected to cause any human pharmacologic response if administered alone or in the amount of the proposed compounded preparation.

So as I was saying - check out the Orange Book. You can determine with it not only which generics the FDA is satisfied have data to back the claim that they are not only bioequivalent, but therapeutically equivalent to the brand name, but which generics have been shown to be equivalent to each other. The Orange Book is a remarkable tool, and not very well advertised to consumers even within the industry.

The FDA recommendation is to choose a generic from a company with an annotation that indicates it is therapeutically equivalent to the brand name.

As a manufacturer, you can embody your tablet using the active ingredient(s) and (there are some rules I'm leaving out here) essentially any combination of these things to make it easier to manufacture or break down in the body - as long as a generic company proves their dosage form has similar bioavailability as the brand name and use the safe/effective amount of active, the FDA doesn't require extra testing, thus reducing the cost of that generic by many, many times.

Re: that's not true

on 30 Jul 2005 16:19 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sin-vraal.livejournal.com

As a side note, Over-the-Counter (OTC) drugs are called "proprietary drugs", not "ethical drugs" - to qualify as OTC with essentially little to no testing, the manufacturer has to evidence that they use "Generally Regarded As Safe and Effective" (GRASE, or sometimes just GRAS) ingredients in GRAS(E) amounts, according to the monograph standards set forth in the United States Pharmacopoeia (USP). This implies the ethicality has been taken out of the hands of the manufacturer, and in the hands of the third-party-yet-nevertheless-government-enforced-as-if-law USP folk. This gets kind of weird, as the Total Control With Whitening toothpaste put out by Crest needed full clinical studies, because it has one or two ingredients that don't have monographs, whereas most toothpastes, mouthwashes, petroleum jellies, et al. OTC products don't require extensive clinical trials (you can read the FDA's guidance documents on OTC qualifications if you search for it on their website, fda.gov).

Re: ick

on 30 Jul 2005 16:23 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] sin-vraal.livejournal.com
Yep. Except if the general anaesthesia doesn't work, as in my case.

I really hope there's new gases out there to which I don't have an idiopathic response. The wisdom teeth ordeal was the *worst*.

on 30 Jul 2005 19:59 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Nono ... I get it. I just hadn't been informed to do that at all costs.

Of course, my half-chipmunk smile now shows that I should've been informed.

on 31 Jul 2005 00:54 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] baronbrian.livejournal.com
I thought you would but I figured I'd chime in just in case.

on 2 Aug 2005 23:10 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] eustacia42.livejournal.com
d00d, that sucks. i had mine out in 2001, and it was icky.

Advice: Try not to physically strain yourself too much until they heal.... I did and ended up swallowing some blood from my wisdom teeth which were aggravated by all the activity, which then consequently made me puke. Yay! :)

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 1 February 2026 13:36
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios