juldea: (spiky)
[personal profile] juldea
For those who, like me, dislike the "Red vs. Blue" mentality (unless we're referring to http://www.redvsblue.com )



Will put behind a cut if someone requests.

on 5 Nov 2004 07:35 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] en-ki.livejournal.com
I am going to start referring everyone who posts this map to Tufte (http://www.powells.com/cgi-bin/biblio?inkey=2-0961392142-3). Tufte is quite right when he says that color scales make it very hard to extract information.

I realize that doing this in grayscale would weaken the contrast with the strict red vs. blue, but things that look like they're meant to convey data and don't make me grind my teeth.

on 5 Nov 2004 07:41 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
This one doesn't convey data? I disagree. Although I do agree it could be shown better...

on 5 Nov 2004 07:57 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] en-ki.livejournal.com
Well, you can extract data from it. But the colors are flat in value (brightness), changing only along a hue scale, and hues don't convey information anywhere near as efficiently as values: you have to keep calibrating your brain against the supplied gradient. In grayscale, the information jumps out at you.

Image

on 5 Nov 2004 08:04 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
I dunno, I get the same amount of information for this one... I'd want the scale to be changed, actually. We're never going to see 100% D or R... so why not set pure white and black at 75%? The contrast would be much more marked.

on 5 Nov 2004 08:09 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] en-ki.livejournal.com
Sure, more contrast is better. I'm not very good at image-manipulation; I just found a ready-made filter that did approximately what I want.

I hear girls parse color better than boys; maybe that's why the color version seems useful to you and frustrating to me. (I'm not colorblind, but it does take conscious attention for me to distinguish similar colors.)

on 5 Nov 2004 08:13 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
girls parse color better than boys

Quite possibly. I do know that the purple map is useless to [livejournal.com profile] londo, who is actually colorblind.

Also, this explains why we have better fashion sense. ;)

on 5 Nov 2004 08:13 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] en-ki.livejournal.com
(Also, DC was 90% Kerry. You wouldn't want to throw away that information by clipping too sharply.)

on 5 Nov 2004 08:15 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Wow... didn't know. Craziness. Maybe something more, uh, logarithmic? Exponential?

on 5 Nov 2004 08:35 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] greyhame.livejournal.com
I also find both maps equally useful. In fact, I think the colored one is slightly better, because the eye tends to skim over grayscale images and get caught by colored ones.

on 5 Nov 2004 11:36 (UTC)
ext_267559: (America)
Posted by [identity profile] mr-teem.livejournal.com
DC went 90% Democratic.

on 5 Nov 2004 11:51 (UTC)
ext_267559: (I have a Clue)
Posted by [identity profile] mr-teem.livejournal.com
Well, you're right about Tufte, in the sense that if you try to extract quantitative information from this map, the color scale is disastrous. This map was intended to convey qualitative information as to relatively how red or blue any given state is. The county-breakdown color scale map that's floating around is even better for this. I wouldn't expect to see a map like this on CNN on election night, but it's a good post-mortem illustration, in my opinion.

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 1 March 2026 18:51
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios