romance novels

[juldea]

Hrm. Perhaps I should do Nanowrimo and write a romance novel that doesn't end in, "...and then they got married and had babies."

Comments

[tpau]

what's wrong with getting married and having babies? i suppose they can gt married and have cats...

[karlean7.livejournal.com]

"They moved in together and had a lot of uninterrupted sex. At one point, they got really into leather. Then they decided to see other people, but for the rest of their lives, they looked back on that summer with unrivaled fondness."

[aphraelimajika.livejournal.com]

::grins:: as an avid reader of the romance novels, i've actually come across a couple that do go something like that. they're more fun that way ::big grin::

[outlander.livejournal.com]

Titles! don't do that and not give titles! I need something without babies...and with sex that was not interupted by the people in the next encampment...wait...that was supposed to be my internal voice. Darn it. Ah well. Titles!

[aphraelimajika.livejournal.com]

the harlequin blaze series is basically porn with a plot. they do tend to have that happy ending, but they have enough sex that it makes up for it. and it was a book in that series, that i don't remember the title of, that included handcuff-y goodness ::shrugs:: of the 100+ titles, i've only read one or two that were flops. they're a safe bet.

[juldea.livejournal.com]

Nothing's wrong with it, but it's not everyone's dream and it shouldn't be the only socially accepted dream.

I am fully supportive of those of my friends who have/will have gotten married and had babies.

[juldea.livejournal.com]

I love you, Mike.

[juldea.livejournal.com]

Woot! Thanks!

[juldea.livejournal.com]

Now that she's given us titles, we'll have to let each other know if we find any so we can swap. ;)