juldea: (sleepy)
[personal profile] juldea
What kind of 21-year old NOT-fundimentally-religious male has never masturbated?!?

on 24 Mar 2003 03:29 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] tank182.livejournal.com
A fucking lame one! I always thought that masterbating was just one of those things that most people(especially males) just start doing before they even realize what's going on. Does he choose not to masterbate or is it that he simply has no sex drive?

on 24 Mar 2003 04:36 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] guvnor.livejournal.com
A quadrupal amputee, maybe?

on 24 Mar 2003 05:07 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ratbastrd.livejournal.com
A lieing one.

on 24 Mar 2003 05:45 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] baronbrian.livejournal.com
Exactly.

on 24 Mar 2003 10:23 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ex-dervish821.livejournal.com
wow, you sound like a real asshole.

on 24 Mar 2003 12:18 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
That's also my guess.

Re:

on 24 Mar 2003 12:30 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] tank182.livejournal.com
I try my hardest...

Re:

on 24 Mar 2003 15:01 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
You could still lie face down and rub back and forth on the bed/ground/whatever...

on 24 Mar 2003 15:09 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
It's a choice, apparently... but I'm going to have to disagree with "fucking lame" ;) The guy's a little weird, but not lame. heh

on 24 Mar 2003 15:10 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
no... I don't think so... but possible, I suppose. Oh well. Not important, just a curiosity.

Re:

on 24 Mar 2003 15:18 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] guvnor.livejournal.com
A quadrupal amputee eunuch?

Re:

on 24 Mar 2003 15:21 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Okay... I suppose you got me there.

On the same thought, a paralyzed eunich would be a viable answer, too.

on 24 Mar 2003 15:37 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ex-dervish821.livejournal.com
wouldn't just paralyzed do it?

Re:

on 24 Mar 2003 15:41 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Depends on how paralyzed, or the above-mentioned rubbing would be possible.

on 24 Mar 2003 16:20 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
I wonder why a person would make that choice. Masturbation is supposed to show that you are in good sexual, psychological health, and people who don't very rarely have healthy sexual relationships. From what I've read.

Re:

on 24 Mar 2003 16:45 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Hehehehe. I doubt you meant it to look that way, but the last "from what I've read" looks like a very funny "not that I know" type statement.

on 24 Mar 2003 18:45 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ex-dervish821.livejournal.com
he may not have read the same stuff you did?

maybe it's like a super-intense "not having sex till i'm married" kind of thing.

Re:

on 24 Mar 2003 19:03 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
True, some people think the opposite, that masturbation is a sign of an unhealthy sex life and low self-esteem. I remember reading an article via Fark.com about how therapists in Japan were saying that masturbation ruined relationships. *shrug*

on 24 Mar 2003 20:26 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
Hehe. That was unintentional. I was just trying to cover my ass because more and more are coming onto LJ to pick huge fights with people who don't put 3 hours of research into every comment they make. :-)

on 24 Mar 2003 20:29 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
correction: more and more *people* are...

on 24 Mar 2003 20:31 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
From everything Cynthia and I have read (and we like to read this stuff a lot - for a while we both wanted to be sex therapists), the reason masturbation is considered healthy is because most people who masturbate are comfortable with their own sexuality. You need to be comfortable with your body and your own sexuality before you expect to bring another person (or people) into the picture. It also helps to know what you like before you expect another person to give it to you.

I think there was a group study somewhere of missionaries who were told to never have any form of premarital sex. When the missionaries eventually got married, their marriages suffered greatly because the partners had no idea how to touch each other. I think that's definitely a problem.

With all due respect to the Japanese, I don't know if one should take their views on sexual health seriously, especially since Japanese women have status approximately equal to the status of a United States woman in the mid-20th century.

Hmm... I wonder how many people I piss off on LJ (on average) each day...?

Re:

on 24 Mar 2003 20:59 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] tank182.livejournal.com
I was being sarcastic of course.. He must be a little strange thought because even though I can understand (on some level) why a 21 year old male may choose not to, I think that it is somewhat un natural that he 'never' has not even back in the days of puberty. Takes all kinds I suppose..

on 24 Mar 2003 21:14 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ex-dervish821.livejournal.com
kind of related:
in the personal ads here, there are innumerable ads for "american man looking for lonely japanese housewife." they always mention stuff like "i'll give you the pleasure you're not getting at home." it always makes me wonder if japanese men are really bad lovers, or if the women aren't taught to enjoy sex, or if american guys just think that bigger dicks make better lovers.

on 24 Mar 2003 21:48 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ex-krink990.livejournal.com
liar liar absolute and total liar.

Re:

on 25 Mar 2003 01:32 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Can you give me examples of people coming on LJ to pick fights because you don't have research??

*snicker*

Re:

on 25 Mar 2003 01:33 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
Oh I totally agree with you and the stuff you've read, but I was just injecting things that I know other people think :)

Hooray for your research however ;)

on 25 Mar 2003 12:21 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
What is the reason for your snicker?

People fight over facts in the pro- and anti-war battles that happen on LJ. It happens on animals rights posts, religion posts, etc. People are constantly being challenged to back up what they say with real articles, books, interviews, etc. They fight over little things like grammar and trivia as well, but it gets a little scary sometimes. This is supposed to be a relaxed journal forum, you know?

on 25 Mar 2003 16:03 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
:-( That's rather sad. (I hope the last part isn't true.)

Re:

on 25 Mar 2003 20:57 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] juldea.livejournal.com
heh I snickered because I was playing on your comment about people requiring statistics by requiring statistics... get it?

on 26 Mar 2003 15:40 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] flyingindie.livejournal.com
Wow. That didn't even hit me. *feels ditzy*

December 2012

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 31 January 2026 13:53
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios