Page Summary
tank182.livejournal.com - (no subject)
guvnor.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ratbastrd.livejournal.com - (no subject)
baronbrian.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ex-dervish821.livejournal.com - (no subject)
flyingindie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tank182.livejournal.com - Re:
juldea.livejournal.com - Re:
juldea.livejournal.com - (no subject)
juldea.livejournal.com - (no subject)
guvnor.livejournal.com - Re:
juldea.livejournal.com - Re:
ex-dervish821.livejournal.com - (no subject)
juldea.livejournal.com - Re:
flyingindie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
juldea.livejournal.com - Re:
ex-dervish821.livejournal.com - (no subject)
juldea.livejournal.com - Re:
flyingindie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
flyingindie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
flyingindie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
tank182.livejournal.com - Re:
ex-dervish821.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ex-krink990.livejournal.com - (no subject)
juldea.livejournal.com - Re:
juldea.livejournal.com - Re:
flyingindie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
flyingindie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
juldea.livejournal.com - Re:
flyingindie.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Dark Purple for Funky Circles by
- Resources: Smoke Curl
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 03:29 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 04:36 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 05:07 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 05:45 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 10:23 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 12:18 (UTC)Re:
on 24 Mar 2003 12:30 (UTC)Re:
on 24 Mar 2003 15:01 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 15:09 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 15:10 (UTC)Re:
on 24 Mar 2003 15:18 (UTC)Re:
on 24 Mar 2003 15:21 (UTC)On the same thought, a paralyzed eunich would be a viable answer, too.
no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 15:37 (UTC)Re:
on 24 Mar 2003 15:41 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 16:20 (UTC)Re:
on 24 Mar 2003 16:45 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 18:45 (UTC)maybe it's like a super-intense "not having sex till i'm married" kind of thing.
Re:
on 24 Mar 2003 19:03 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 20:26 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 20:29 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 20:31 (UTC)I think there was a group study somewhere of missionaries who were told to never have any form of premarital sex. When the missionaries eventually got married, their marriages suffered greatly because the partners had no idea how to touch each other. I think that's definitely a problem.
With all due respect to the Japanese, I don't know if one should take their views on sexual health seriously, especially since Japanese women have status approximately equal to the status of a United States woman in the mid-20th century.
Hmm... I wonder how many people I piss off on LJ (on average) each day...?
Re:
on 24 Mar 2003 20:59 (UTC)no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 21:14 (UTC)in the personal ads here, there are innumerable ads for "american man looking for lonely japanese housewife." they always mention stuff like "i'll give you the pleasure you're not getting at home." it always makes me wonder if japanese men are really bad lovers, or if the women aren't taught to enjoy sex, or if american guys just think that bigger dicks make better lovers.
no subject
on 24 Mar 2003 21:48 (UTC)Re:
on 25 Mar 2003 01:32 (UTC)*snicker*
Re:
on 25 Mar 2003 01:33 (UTC)Hooray for your research however ;)
no subject
on 25 Mar 2003 12:21 (UTC)People fight over facts in the pro- and anti-war battles that happen on LJ. It happens on animals rights posts, religion posts, etc. People are constantly being challenged to back up what they say with real articles, books, interviews, etc. They fight over little things like grammar and trivia as well, but it gets a little scary sometimes. This is supposed to be a relaxed journal forum, you know?
no subject
on 25 Mar 2003 16:03 (UTC)Re:
on 25 Mar 2003 20:57 (UTC)no subject
on 26 Mar 2003 15:40 (UTC)