For those who aren't aware, there's a pro-life license plate available in Massachusetts now. It's been the talk of a lot of debate, and I just looked up the laws surrounding special license plate requests, and wanted to make sure the information was spread.
The law is here: http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXIV/Chapter90/Section2F -- I shall summarize:
(a) If you can gather $100,000 and 1,500 people to both sign (with full name, address, and phone number) and to pay $40 each to pre-order a special license plate, you can get a special plate made in Massachusetts. You submit a design to the registrar, and they have 90 days to approve it and make you a design. There is no option written in the law for the registrar to refuse any submission; the wording is, "The registrar shall approve..." (emphasis mine.)
(b) 3,000 plates will be made in the first two years. If you manage to get 3,000 people to buy the plates, you get your $100,000 back. If not, it will be used to pay for the plates already ordered.
(c) There's a bunch of charities the government likes for these plates. (Honestly, I can't figure out what this section is for. Maybe one of you lawyer-y types can clarify.)
(d) I'll reprint this one in total, adding emphasis: "(d) The registrar shall design, produce, issue and regulate the use of distinctive registration plates proposed by any agency, charity or nonprofit organization that has satisfactorily complied with the conditions and requirements set forth in subsection (a)." If you do the things in step a, you get a plate. End of discussion. No matter the subject.
So. Yeah. There are plates out there now that express an idea that misquemes me. That sucks. But this law also means that 1,499 friends and I can get together money and order a plate that says something I like but someone else dislikes, maybe even something someone else finds offensive. I like keeping that option available. That's what living in a free society is all about.
What REALLY sucks is that this law isn't obvious, and there will be people who think the RMV and therefore the state government itself is promoting the Pro-Life movement. I don't know what to do about that part.
Apologies if I've made any really glaring errors here. It's 2am, and I should really be going to bed.
The law is here: http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXIV/Chapter90/Section2F -- I shall summarize:
(a) If you can gather $100,000 and 1,500 people to both sign (with full name, address, and phone number) and to pay $40 each to pre-order a special license plate, you can get a special plate made in Massachusetts. You submit a design to the registrar, and they have 90 days to approve it and make you a design. There is no option written in the law for the registrar to refuse any submission; the wording is, "The registrar shall approve..." (emphasis mine.)
(b) 3,000 plates will be made in the first two years. If you manage to get 3,000 people to buy the plates, you get your $100,000 back. If not, it will be used to pay for the plates already ordered.
(c) There's a bunch of charities the government likes for these plates. (Honestly, I can't figure out what this section is for. Maybe one of you lawyer-y types can clarify.)
(d) I'll reprint this one in total, adding emphasis: "(d) The registrar shall design, produce, issue and regulate the use of distinctive registration plates proposed by any agency, charity or nonprofit organization that has satisfactorily complied with the conditions and requirements set forth in subsection (a)." If you do the things in step a, you get a plate. End of discussion. No matter the subject.
So. Yeah. There are plates out there now that express an idea that misquemes me. That sucks. But this law also means that 1,499 friends and I can get together money and order a plate that says something I like but someone else dislikes, maybe even something someone else finds offensive. I like keeping that option available. That's what living in a free society is all about.
What REALLY sucks is that this law isn't obvious, and there will be people who think the RMV and therefore the state government itself is promoting the Pro-Life movement. I don't know what to do about that part.
Apologies if I've made any really glaring errors here. It's 2am, and I should really be going to bed.
no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 07:50 (UTC)Despite what it says, I find it highly unlikely that a racially offensive plate would get created, even if submitted properly. I imagine it would somehow get stopped. And once one plate is stopped, they would then need to figure out what the standards are and why the stuff submitted before was fine and the one that was stopped wasn't.
no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 14:05 (UTC)I agree that if something racially offensive slipped past, there would be some time spent at the legislature looking at this rule. However, I'm not sure it could be legally stopped during the process. The backers would certainly have a case against the state if it were.
no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 12:18 (UTC)no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 12:21 (UTC)And misqueme.
no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 14:07 (UTC)no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 14:09 (UTC)If I had $100k to spare, I would honestly do this. "People Against Stupidity" or "License Plates Are For Morons" or "ZOMBIE AWARENESS" with a bleeding ribbon or something.
no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 14:16 (UTC)no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 14:14 (UTC)Well, I'm going to start by linking to this entry to explain to people what's up.
no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 17:51 (UTC)no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 17:04 (UTC)no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 21:19 (UTC)no subject
on 20 Nov 2010 20:10 (UTC)If we want to get all political about it. I mean, hey, Massachusetts.
no subject
on 22 Nov 2010 15:13 (UTC)no subject
on 22 Nov 2010 15:15 (UTC)I mean, really my opinion on the whole thing anyway was that since you can just get a plain plate, it wasn't really any different than a plate and a bumper sticker. Of course,
no subject
on 22 Nov 2010 15:18 (UTC)